linux-kernel - Re: [Ecryptfs-devel] [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090115155143.e4509e7e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:51:43 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	ecryptfs-devel@...ts.launchpad.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mhalcrow@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Ecryptfs-devel] [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a
 question

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:39:08 -0600
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > I am puzzled by the current ecryptfs maintenance situation.
> > 
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/768122
> 
> The torch has been passed to me.  :)

yup, thanks.

> > I queued this for 2.6.30.  It could be bumped up for 2.6.29 (and even
> > backported to 2.6.28 and earlier) with suitable acks from the
> > maintainer(?)
> > 
> 
> The changes to ecryptfs_rmdir() are valid, but not the rest of the patch.
> 

OK, I'll drop my copy.  Please send something back at me sometime, with
indications about which kernel version(s) it should be merged into.

We should chase J.R.  for a Signed-off-by:, which was omitted from the
original patch.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/