[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496ECBA0.60209@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:37:36 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs
Hello,
James Bottomley wrote:
> I'm afraid that's pretty much marketing coolaid. Rotational storage
> will dominate for the forseeable future: just do a simple back of the
> envelope calculation:
Or just compare prices per byte of memory, flash and rotation disk.
They haven't had changed too much during last several years.
Secondary storage which is only slightly cheaper than the primary
storage doesn't have much chance of flying high and far.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists