linux-kernel - Re: Is 386 processor still supported?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090116101319.GT11087@lug-owl.de>
Date:	Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:13:19 +0100
From:	Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Adam Osuchowski <adwol@...k.pl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Is 386 processor still supported?

On Fri, 2009-01-16 10:00:02 +0100, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:
> > patches are welcome ...
> 
> Hehe, I guess the only long-term solution is to get shiny old 386 as a
> part of Ingo's test farm ;-).

:-D  I'm currently cleaning up the flat, 'll try to dig out the old
patch tonight. Maybe I can play with it a bit on my original i386
hardware. (I've already tested it, it still powers on and boots up
that ancient debian version. Using a 20GB (right, gigabytes) HDD.)

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@...-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:                http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
the second  :

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)