[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17214.1232120028@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:33:48 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
t-sato@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow SysRq emergency sync to thaw frozen filesystems
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:59:10 CST, Eric Sandeen said:
> Oh, actually, I'd think not. If the freeze was done properly by the
> filesystem, all data was flushed, the fs was quiesced, and new IO was
> blocked. pdflush should never be visiting these...
Yes, but a lot of 'if's - and usually you're reaching for sysrq-S precisely
*because* you suspect that stuff wasn't happening properly on its own...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists