[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18022.1232121154@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:52:34 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Takashi Sato <t-sato@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow SysRq emergency sync to thaw frozen filesystems
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:40:26 EST, Theodore Tso said:
> My biggest complaint is that the two operations are largely
> orthogonal. Emergency sync and unfreeze are two very different
> operations, and while emergency sync is largely harmless, it just
> seems really unclean to combine the two. For one thing, it'll be
> extremely non-obvious that emergency sync implies unfreeze, and
> changing the sysrq help to say emergency-Sync-and-unfreeze just
> screams "kludge"....
Fair enough - as it is, I usually end up doing sysrq-s, -s, -u, -s, -b
anyhow because each sysrq- does one little thing, adding another little
thing on some other control-meta-alt-cokebottle key *is* probably the
right choice, we still have a few keyscan codes left.. ;)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists