[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090116081359.567a4dc9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:13:59 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 36/51] revert "mm: vmalloc use mutex for purge"
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:43:12 +0100 Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:38:56AM +0100, Christophe Saout wrote:
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > > Weird. It seem to be something to do with Xen (and btrfs? or was it reproduced
> > > without?).
> >
> > I got this bug without btrfs. Seen on both Xen x86_32 and x86_64.
> >
> > Note that I also some a different issue with CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
> > Seems like Xen tears down current->mm early on process termination, so
> > that __get_user_pages in exit_mmap causes nasty messages when the
> > process had any mlocked pages. (in fact, it somehow manages to get into
> > the swapping code and produces a null pointer dereference trying to get
> > a swap token)
>
> There is an oops there, yes. I remember I patch we have, although it was
> specifically for kernel threads rather than this issue. Xen could easily
> have bigger issues if it is exiting the mm before that final get_user_pages.
>
>
>
> > > Anyway, I agree with the revert for the moment, but I'm worried that it might
> > > be hiding another bug... I might add a few might_sleep and in_atomic warnings
> > > around the place to see if it might find the culprit without crashing machines.
> >
> > If you need some testing, please tell me. On a dual-core machine this
> > bug happens within few minutes of a compiler run.
>
> Ok, thanks... I'll see if I can get to it next week.
>
> ---
>
> From: Dean Roe <roe@....com>
> Subject: Prevent NULL pointer deref in grab_swap_token
> References: 159260
>
> grab_swap_token() assumes that the current process has an mm struct,
> which is not true for kernel threads invoking get_user_pages(). Since
> this should be extremely rare, just return from grab_swap_token()
> without doing anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dean Roe <roe@....com>
> Acked-by: mason@...e.de
> Acked-by: okir@...e.de
>
>
> mm/thrash.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/mm/thrash.c
> +++ b/mm/thrash.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ void grab_swap_token(void)
> int current_interval;
>
> global_faults++;
> + if (current->mm == NULL)
> + return;
> +
>
> current_interval = global_faults - current->mm->faultstamp;
>
Confused. Why was there a random, seemingly-unrelated patch at the end
of this email?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists