[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090116163021.GA27495@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:30:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: updates to tip
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > > [...] We can register a function to be traced via the function pointer,
> > > and we can pick which functions to trace, but we can not separate out
> > > different functions for different traces.
> >
> > Why not? We could have a hash of all traced functions with metadata
> > attached. Since patching functions in/out would be a relatively rare
> > operation, this would be a highly efficient read-mostly hash.
>
> I was afraid you would say that :-)
>
> Yes, we could add something to do this. It would take some thought on a
> good api, and implementation. This is not an easy task by any means. We
> need a way to map between a function call and a tracer, where a function
> call can call more than one tracer.
Note that some other things could be consolidated under per function
metadata: for example set_graph_function - which really is a per function
attribute too. Plus a lot of new things would be enabled i think.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists