[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090116170938.GA11346@google.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:09:38 -0800
From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>
To: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, rientjes@...gle.com, mbligh@...gle.com,
thockin@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH] softlockup: fix to allow compiling with !DETECT_HUNG_TASK
Ingo Molnar (mingo@...e.hu) wrote:
>
> doesnt build with !SOFTLOCKUP:
>
> kernel/fork.c:1049: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'last_switch_count'
> kernel/fork.c:1050: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'last_switch_timestamp'
>
> Could you send a delta fix patch relative to -v4 please? Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Oops. Will be more careful next time.
---
Fixes the following compile error:
kernel/fork.c:1049: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'last_switch_count'
kernel/fork.c:1050: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'last_switch_timestamp'
Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>
---
kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index fb1f5e9..d68e59b 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
p->default_timer_slack_ns = current->timer_slack_ns;
-#ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
+#ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK
p->last_switch_count = 0;
p->last_switch_timestamp = 0;
#endif
--
1.5.4.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists