[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1232129299-22018-5-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:08:12 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 04/11] ocfs2: Fix possible deadlock in ocfs2_write_dquot()
It could happen that some limit has been set via quotactl() and in parallel
->mark_dirty() is called from another thread doing e.g. dquot_alloc_space(). In
such case ocfs2_write_dquot() must not try to sync the dquot because that needs
global quota lock but that ranks above transaction start.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>
---
fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c b/fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c
index f4efa89..1ed0f7c 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/quota_global.c
@@ -754,7 +754,9 @@ static int ocfs2_mark_dquot_dirty(struct dquot *dquot)
if (dquot->dq_flags & mask)
sync = 1;
spin_unlock(&dq_data_lock);
- if (!sync) {
+ /* This is a slight hack but we can't afford getting global quota
+ * lock if we already have a transaction started. */
+ if (!sync || journal_current_handle()) {
status = ocfs2_write_dquot(dquot);
goto out;
}
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists