linux-kernel - Re: RAID v/s Normal redundant files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901161353580.18009@asgard.lang.hm>
Date:	Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:55:11 -0800 (PST)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	Prateek Donni <prateek.donni@...il.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID v/s Normal redundant files

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Prateek Donni wrote:

> Can normal redundant files perform better than RAID configuration.

sometimes, it depends on how you have them setup and where the bottlenecks 
are in your system.

note that RAID is also supposed to do integrity checking on reads that you 
would have to do in userspace with redundant files.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/