| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20090116120227.def88bc8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:02:27 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> Cc: matthltc@...ibm.com, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] NOOP cgroup subsystem On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:45:02 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:20:45 -0800 > Matthew Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com> wrote: > I think > - Paul's suggestion sounds attractive. But I can't see fundamental differences > from user's side between "implemented as subsys" and "implemetned as cgroup's > feature". I feel it's easier for user's cgroup library to handle subsys rather > than "we can mount it anywhere, multiple times!". > Flexiblity doesn't means it's easy to use. I should consider more.... mutiple mount point means that the process can belongs to multiple nickname groups. oh yes, seems worth to try. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists