[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090116001200.GA9137@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:12:00 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
brgerst@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, travis@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steiner@....com, hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: add optimized generic percpu accessors
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>> Of course. But do any architectures actually _need_ that for a single
>> read?
>
> not for a read i guess - but for the other ops like add/and/or/xor.
One of the things I'd like to see happen with this work is for
us to have a cheap per-cpu atomic counter that we can use for
SNMP stats.
If we can make the inc/add variants into a single instruction,
then it won't need to disable preemption or interrupts.
So if you could design the API such that we have a variant of
add/inc that automatically disables/enables preemption then we
can optimise that away on x86.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists