linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7][v6] Container-init signal semantics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090117204611.GA12283@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:46:11 -0800
From:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, roland@...hat.com, bastian@...di.eu.org,
	daniel@...ac.com, xemul@...nvz.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v6] Container-init signal semantics

Oleg Nesterov [oleg@...hat.com] wrote:
| Eric, Roland, what do you think ?
| 
| The whole series looks good to me. I think it adds minimal
| complications to solove the problem.

Thanks Oleg.

I made a small style update - basically removed the helpers
siginfo_from_user() and siginfo_from_ancestor_ns() and moved their
logic into send_signal() (merged patch 4 and 5 from [v6] patchset). 

Also added a patch to update /proc/pid/status to include SIG_DFL
signals and removed a pending todo for the patchset.

Roland, Eric, Daniel, Bastian, can you please comment on the [v7]
patchset ?

Thanks,

Sukadev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/