| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1232293169.5204.14.camel@laptop>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:39:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [2.6.29-rc2] Inconsistent lock state on resume in
hres_timers_resume
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 16:41 +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> [17854.688347] =================================
> [17854.688347] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> [17854.688347] 2.6.29-rc2-1avb #1
> [17854.688347] ---------------------------------
> [17854.688347] inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
> [17854.688347] pm-suspend/18240 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> [17854.688347] (&cpu_base->lock){++..}, at: [<c0136fcc>] retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
> [17854.688347] [<c01443cd>] __lock_acquire+0x79d/0x1930
> [17854.688347] [<c01455bc>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x80
> [17854.688347] [<c03092e5>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x70
> [17854.688347] [<c0136e61>] hrtimer_run_queues+0x31/0x140
> [17854.688347] [<c0128d98>] run_local_timers+0x8/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c0128dd3>] update_process_times+0x23/0x60
> [17854.688347] [<c013e274>] tick_periodic+0x24/0x80
> [17854.688347] [<c013e2e2>] tick_handle_periodic+0x12/0x70
> [17854.688347] [<c0104e24>] timer_interrupt+0x14/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c01607b9>] handle_IRQ_event+0x29/0x60
> [17854.688347] [<c0161c59>] handle_level_irq+0x69/0xe0
> [17854.688347] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> [17854.688347] irq event stamp: 55771
> [17854.688347] hardirqs last enabled at (55771): [<c0309125>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
> [17854.688347] hardirqs last disabled at (55770): [<c0309419>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x19/0x80
> [17854.688347] softirqs last enabled at (54836): [<c0124f54>] __do_softirq+0xc4/0x110
> [17854.688347] softirqs last disabled at (54831): [<c01049ae>] do_softirq+0x8e/0xe0
> [17854.688347]
> [17854.688347] other info that might help us debug this:
> [17854.688347] 3 locks held by pm-suspend/18240:
> [17854.688347] #0: (&buffer->mutex){--..}, at: [<c01dd4c5>] sysfs_write_file+0x25/0x100
> [17854.688347] #1: (pm_mutex){--..}, at: [<c015056f>] enter_state+0x4f/0x140
> [17854.688347] #2: (dpm_list_mtx){--..}, at: [<c027880f>] device_pm_lock+0xf/0x20
> [17854.688347]
> [17854.688347] stack backtrace:
> [17854.688347] Pid: 18240, comm: pm-suspend Not tainted 2.6.29-rc2-1avb #1
> [17854.688347] Call Trace:
> [17854.688347] [<c0306248>] ? printk+0x18/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c0141fac>] print_usage_bug+0x16c/0x1d0
> [17854.688347] [<c0142bcf>] mark_lock+0x8bf/0xc90
> [17854.688347] [<c0106b8f>] ? pit_next_event+0x2f/0x40
> [17854.688347] [<c01441b0>] __lock_acquire+0x580/0x1930
> [17854.688347] [<c030916d>] ? _spin_unlock+0x1d/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c0106b8f>] ? pit_next_event+0x2f/0x40
> [17854.688347] [<c013dd38>] ? clockevents_program_event+0x98/0x160
> [17854.688347] [<c0142fe8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x90
> [17854.688347] [<c0309125>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
> [17854.688347] [<c0143229>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x139/0x190
> [17854.688347] [<c014328b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
> [17854.688347] [<c01455bc>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x80
> [17854.688347] [<c0136fcc>] ? retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] [<c03092e5>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x70
> [17854.688347] [<c0136fcc>] ? retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] [<c0136fcc>] retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] [<c013711a>] hres_timers_resume+0xa/0x10
> [17854.688347] [<c013aa8e>] timekeeping_resume+0xee/0x150
> [17854.688347] [<c0273384>] __sysdev_resume+0x14/0x50
> [17854.688347] [<c0273407>] sysdev_resume+0x47/0x80
> [17854.688347] [<c02791ab>] device_power_up+0xb/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c015043f>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xcf/0x150
> [17854.688347] [<c0150c2f>] ? freeze_processes+0x3f/0x90
> [17854.688347] [<c0150614>] enter_state+0xf4/0x140
> [17854.688347] [<c01506dd>] state_store+0x7d/0xc0
> [17854.688347] [<c0150660>] ? state_store+0x0/0xc0
> [17854.688347] [<c0202da4>] kobj_attr_store+0x24/0x30
> [17854.688347] [<c01dd53c>] sysfs_write_file+0x9c/0x100
> [17854.688347] [<c019916c>] vfs_write+0x9c/0x160
> [17854.688347] [<c0103494>] ? restore_nocheck_notrace+0x0/0xe
> [17854.688347] [<c01dd4a0>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x100
> [17854.688347] [<c01992ed>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
> [17854.688347] [<c0103371>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31
Not sure what caused this to trigger, but it looks like
timekeeping_resume() isn't called with IRQs disabled (and the code
doesn't seem to expect that since it uses write_seqlock_irqsave).
hres_timers_resume() however calls retrigger_next_event() which does
require IRQs disabled and doesn't do that.
Like said, I'm not sure what caused this since the code in question
doesn't seem to have changed since April 2007.
Anyway, does the below patch cure trouble?
---
Subject: hrtimer: fix irq recursion deadlock
retrigger_next_event() requires IRQs disabled, provide that for the
resume callback.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index 2c40ee8..430103d 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -614,8 +614,12 @@ void clock_was_set(void)
*/
void hres_timers_resume(void)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
/* Retrigger the CPU local events: */
+ local_irq_save(flags);
retrigger_next_event(NULL);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists