[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090118182042.GD30821@kernel.dk>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:20:43 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...e.de>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] splice: fix deadlock
On Sun, Jan 18 2009, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> From 8e1d58b03b47d937bc5e53d902bac6e690709034 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:07:29 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] splice: fix deadlock
>
> splice from a file or socket needs to lock both the file/socket and the
> pipe inodes. pipe_wait() unlocks only the pipe lock, regardless of the
> order in which they were taken.
>
> This patch adds an additional (optional) argument to pipe_wait(); if
> specified, pipe_wait() will unlock and reacquire both inode locks.
>
> It fixes the lockup that occurs with the test-case below, but please
> review carefully. Consider this patch a proposal rather than a fix.
Thanks for the bug report and test case, it is indeed buggy! Good
spotting. I'll review your patch thoroughly and test it, and then
integrate your patch.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists