linux-kernel - Re: [XFS] Update maintainers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090118185530.GA1857@sgi.com>
Date:	Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:55:30 -0600
From:	Bill O'Donnell <billodo@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@....com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS] Update maintainers

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:52:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
| On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 19:05 -0600, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
| > No, I'd prefer we keep the maintainer contact address 
| > as a centralized SGI mail address.  In fact, it would be 
| > best if we remove my name entirely, and leave contact 
| > completely centralized to SGI.
| 
| Do I read this as nobody wanting to be personally responsible for XFS
| anymore?

No, you're misunderstanding. Rather than a single POC, there are 
multiple contacts inside SGI, devoted to XFS.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/