[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73c1f2160901172105p8ba1aa4v708e746d5548a79d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:05:34 -0500
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] x86-64: Convert irqstacks to per-cpu
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Brian Gerst wrote:
>> @@ -211,15 +211,13 @@ ENTRY(secondary_startup_64)
>> * data area. Computing this requires two symbols - __per_cpu_load
>> * and per_cpu__gdt_page. As linker can't do no such relocation, do
>> * it by hand. As early_gdt_descr is manipulated by C code for
>> - * secondary CPUs, this should be done only once for the boot CPU
>> - * when early_gdt_descr_base contains zero.
>> + * secondary CPUs, this should be done only once for the boot CPU.
>> */
>
> It would probably be nice to mention that it's calculating per cpu
> load addresses for early access. The comment only refers to gdt_page
> which is a bit misleading as it now also adjusts irqstackptr.
>
> Also, as pda field name, irqstackptr might be fine but wouldn't it be
> better to rename it to at least irq_stack_ptr as this change requires
> touching every users anyway?
I kept the same name unless it would conflict with something. If you
want to rename it, it should be a separate patch.
--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists