[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4972E4AC.9080000@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:13:32 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/17] x86-64: Remove the PDA
Hello, Brian.
Brian Gerst wrote:
>> How about something like the following?
>>
>> #define CANARY_OFFSET 40
>> #define CANARY_SIZE 8
>>
>> DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, stack_canary);
>>
>> and in linker script,
>>
>> PERCPU_VADDR_PREALLOC(0, :percpu, CANARY_OFFSET + CANARY_SIZE)
>> per_cpu__stack_canary = __per_cpu_start + CANARY_OFFSET;
>>
>
> The thing I don't like about the prealloc method is that it puts the
> page-aligned variables at the end. This leaves a gap which is
> unavailable for dynamic allocations. Stealing 48 bytes from the
> bottom of the irqstack (which is 16k) keeps the page-aligned section
> at the start. It's really no different than how the thread_info
> structure sits at the bottom of the process stack.
>
> How about something like:
> union irq_stack_union {
> char irq_stack[IRQSTACKSIZE];
> struct {
> char pad[40];
> unsigned long stack_canary;
> }
> };
>
> That documents the overlay better, and avoids having to touch the
> linker script.
I have no objection as long as it's sufficiently documented.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists