linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86, pat: fix reserve

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090118080844.GA1911@ucw.cz>
Date:	Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:08:44 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tvignaud@...driva.com" <tvignaud@...driva.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, pat: fix reserve_memtype() for legacy 1MB range

On Sat 2009-01-17 15:24:39, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2009-01-09 14:48:04, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:39:31PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>> Suresh Siddha wrote:
> >>>> Here X is trying to map first 8KB of memory using /dev/mem. Existing
> >>>> code treats first 0-4KB of memory as non-RAM and 4KB-8KB as RAM. Recent
> >>>> code changes don't allow to map memory with different attributes
> >>>> at the same time.
> >>>>
> >>> Why was 0-4 KB marked as non-RAM?  It is most definitely RAM, and should
> >>> be WB.
> >> While in reality it is RAM, we have CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM which doesn't allow
> >> apps to map RAM pages using /dev/mem. And to allow app's to map the
> >> legacy 0-4KB bios data page, we consider it as non-RAM.
> > 
> > Fix config_strict_devmem? Ram is ram, and we should not li for
> > strict_devmem benefit...
> 
> *As far as I understand* this is only considered non-RAM for the purpose
> of strict_devmem?

I did not look *too* closely, but the patch at the beggining of this
thread was for pat.c or something like that. I'd expect it to change
/dev/mem code...
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/