linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:59:23 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Can you reproduce those latencies? We didnt get similar reports from 
> elsewhere so there seems to be a KVM angle.
>   

A simple test running 10 idle guests over 4 cores doesn't reproduce 
(2.6.29-rc).  However we likely need a more complicated setup.

Kevin, any details about your setup?  What are the guests doing?  Are 
you overcommitting memory (is the host swapping)?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/