[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497469AC.2030107@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:53:16 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -tip v3] fix 39 'make headers_check' warnings
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> They are. This bits advertise to userspace what features kvm supports,
>> both compile- and run-time.
>>
>
> This is wrong...
> The headers does not change with the kernel configuration and advertising the
> kvm features via a .h file like this is simply plain broken.
>
Ok. Don't know why I thought unifdef was supplied with the full
configuration.
> You cannot assume that the header files are generated with the exact same config
> as used by the running kernel.
>
This is just for arch specific defines. I'll move these to asm/kvm.h.
> And userspace has in no way access to the CONFIG_ namespace which is purely kernel-internal.
>
> I cannot see how you have ever seen kcm advertise that for example KVM_CAP_USER_NMI
> equals to 22 because CONFIG_X86 is never (supposed to be) defined in userspace -
> except if you did so yourself by some means.
>
We did, we ship a hacked-up kvm.h (generated by unifdef) with our userspace.
Thanks for the clarifications, helpful as always.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists