[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090119131224.GC7424@hack.private>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:12:24 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>
Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Btrfs: use BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX for struct
btrfs_ioctl_vol_args
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:03:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>>
>> I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and
>> it also looks that this one is more proper.
>>
>> Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it.
>>
>
>Nope, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX is specifically used for the ioctl stuff, makes the
>arguments 4k aligned, this patch is incorrect. Thanks,
Ok, then what is BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX? :)
--
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists