[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901191541.41305.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:41:41 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: petkovbb@...il.com
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] ide: remove no longer needed IDE_HFLAG[_FORCE]_LEGACY_IRQS
On Monday 19 January 2009, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
>
> [.. ]
>
> > Index: b/include/linux/ide.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/include/linux/ide.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ide.h
> > @@ -1347,10 +1347,6 @@ enum {
> > IDE_HFLAG_ERROR_STOPS_FIFO = (1 << 19),
> > /* serialize ports */
> > IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE = (1 << 20),
> > - /* use legacy IRQs */
> > - IDE_HFLAG_LEGACY_IRQS = (1 << 21),
> > - /* force use of legacy IRQs */
> > - IDE_HFLAG_FORCE_LEGACY_IRQS = (1 << 22),
> > /* host is TRM290 */
> > IDE_HFLAG_TRM290 = (1 << 23),
> > /* use 32-bit I/O ops */
>
> maybe contigious numbering of the enums here?
I plan to re-use these two flags quite soon for other purposes so I thought
that I may save some time/noise on moving the rest of flags around... :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists