[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901192143.02853.arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:43:00 +0300
From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>
Cc: e1000-devel@...ts.soutceforge.net,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.29-rc2 regression] e100: netconsole not functional because of missing firmware
On 19 января 2009 21:30:01 Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
wrote:
> > [ 2.008509] e100: eth0: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load
> > firmware "e100/d101m_ucode.bin": -22
> > [ 2.010461] netconsole: failed to open eth0
> > [ 2.010996] netconsole: cleaning up
> >
> > This has been working all the time without requiring any external
> > firmware to be present. Why it suddenly refuses to work now?
>
> to use netconsole you probably need to set config option
> CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y
>
Yes, I already figured that much :) Unfortunately, there seems to be a
bug that prevents compiling firmware if src != obj. At least it does not
work for me.
> Hm, I wonder if we couldn't have netconsole=y select
> CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL in Kconfig
>
That probably is overkill; unfortunately I am afraid there is no way to
make kconfig automatically select correct firmware in case e100 is built
in.
Thank you!
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists