[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901192012.51422.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:12:51 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ide: move SFF I/O code to ide-io-sff.c
On Monday 19 January 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Tried looking at how in*()/out*() are defined on x86?
>
> Tried looking at how ide_mm_inb is defined on x86
>
> > > It's already making function calls, without the benefit of inlining and
> >
> > I'm afraid you're wrong here.
>
> I'm afraid you are the one who is wrong. The IDE layer is duplicating a
> generic level of indirection with its own code - purely because IDE
> pre-dates that core functionality. The whole IDE layer indirection can go
> away because Linux has caught up with the needs of the IDE layer.
I wish it would be so simple as I would have removed the said indirection
long time ago. Unfortunately:
- not all archs support ioread() & co.
- there is still issue with cache aliasing on some CPUs
Once above deficiences get fixed we can look into ioread() conversion again.
[ IOW right now it is the correct thing to stick to ide_mm_*() indirection
since extra hardware coverage is more valuable than minor code cleanup. ]
Thanks,
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists