linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] DMI: Introduce dmi_first_match to make the interface more flexible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200901192215.27650.elendil@planet.nl>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:15:24 +0100
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, tj@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] DMI: Introduce dmi_first_match to make the interface more flexible

On Monday 19 January 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> +const struct dmi_system_id *dmi_first_match(const struct dmi_system_id
> *list)
> +{ 
> +       const struct dmi_system_id *d;
> +
> +       for (d = list; d->ident; d++)
> +               if (dmi_matches(d))
> +                       return d;
> +
> +       return NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dmi_first_match);

I did indeed have an older version of the patches (before you split them 
out) and that was missing the "const" in the first quoted line, so that 
explains the warning I had.

If I compare the version I've been running with the past months and this 
series I see only minor changes and I don't expect any problems from 
them. If I notice anything I'll let you know. No news is good news :-)

Thanks,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/