[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497598BF.9080704@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:26:23 +0100
From: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hch@...radead.org,
xfs mailing list <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO
Dave Chinner pisze:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:44:48PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Jacek Luczak wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've stepped into XFS issue/bug. Yesterday I've compiled 2.6.29-rc2 and no
>>> didn't found errors. Today I've booted my notebook and XFS bug have occurred.
>>> System reboot didn't helped, same error appeared.
>>>
>>> Some info:
>>> [1] config: http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2.config
>>> [2] kernel logs:
>>> http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2_XFS-bug.log
>>> [3] most interesting part of log below.
>> so this happens every mount? Reproducible is good. How large is the
>> filesystem (too large to extract elsewhere for analysis...?) (plus I
>> suppose it'll be hard to get to it when you can't even boot....)
>
> XFS folks, I suspect the common link between all the reports of this
> bug is that they are on 32-bit kernels. I can't reproduce this on
> a 64 bit kernel, and I'm trying to get a 32-bit UML built right now
> to test this theory.
>
Yep, 32-bits here. I've googled a while looking for some answer and it looks
like it has happen before in various kernel version (no report regarding 2.6.29
AFAIR).
-Jacek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists