linux-kernel - Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090120114906.GA12526@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:49:06 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs mailing list <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:47:16PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig pisze:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:46:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:44:48PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>> Jacek Luczak wrote:
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've stepped into XFS issue/bug. Yesterday I've compiled 2.6.29-rc2 and no
> >>>> didn't found errors. Today I've booted my notebook and XFS bug have occurred.
> >>>> System reboot didn't helped, same error appeared.
> >>>>
> >>>> Some info:
> >>>> [1] config: http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2.config
> >>>> [2] kernel logs:
> >>>> http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2_XFS-bug.log
> >>>> [3] most interesting part of log below.
> >>> so this happens every mount?  Reproducible is good.  How large is the
> >>> filesystem (too large to extract elsewhere for analysis...?) (plus I
> >>> suppose it'll be hard to get to it when you can't even boot....)
> >> XFS folks, I suspect the common link between all the reports of this
> >> bug is that they are on 32-bit kernels. I can't reproduce this on
> >> a 64 bit kernel, and I'm trying to get a 32-bit UML built right now
> >> to test this theory.
> > 
> > I'm doing about half of my testing on 32 bit x86, and I couldn't
> > reproduce the detailed receipe  in the kernel.org bugzilla yet.
> > 
> > Just curious:  do you have CONFIG_LBD set?
> > 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> the answer is:
> $ grep LBD .config
> # CONFIG_LBD is not set

Ok, let me reproduce it without that set..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/