[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090120125652.GA1457@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:56:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...xo.wumi.org.au>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
* Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au> wrote:
> > This suggests some sort of KVM-specific problem. Scheduler latencies
> > in the seconds that occur under normal load situations are noticed and
> > reported quickly - and there are no such open regressions currently.
>
> It at least suggests a problem with interaction between the scheduler
> and kvm, otherwise reverting that scheduler patch wouldn't have made the
> regression go away.
the scheduler affects almost everything, so almost by definition a
scheduler change can tickle a race or other timing bug in just about any
code - and reverting that change in the scheduler can make the bug go
away. But yes, it could also be a genuine scheduler bug - that is always a
possibility.
Could you please run a cfs-debug-info.sh session on a CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y
and CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y kernel, while you are experiencing those
latencies:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
and post that (relatively large) somewhere, or send it as a reply after
bzip2 -9 compressing it? It will include a lot of information about the
delays your tasks are experiencing.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists