linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:07:14 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...xo.wumi.org.au>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > > This suggests some sort of KVM-specific problem. Scheduler latencies 
> > > in the seconds that occur under normal load situations are noticed and 
> > > reported quickly - and there are no such open regressions currently.
> > 
> > It at least suggests a problem with interaction between the scheduler 
> > and kvm, otherwise reverting that scheduler patch wouldn't have made the 
> > regression go away.
> 
> the scheduler affects almost everything, so almost by definition a 
> scheduler change can tickle a race or other timing bug in just about any 
> code - and reverting that change in the scheduler can make the bug go 
> away. But yes, it could also be a genuine scheduler bug - that is always a 
> possibility.
> 
> Could you please run a cfs-debug-info.sh session on a CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y 
> and CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y kernel, while you are experiencing those 
> latencies:
> 
>   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
> 
> and post that (relatively large) somewhere, or send it as a reply after 
> bzip2 -9 compressing it? It will include a lot of information about the 
> delays your tasks are experiencing.

Another test would be to build the scheduler latency tracer into your 
kernel:

    CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER=y

And enable it via:

    echo wakeup > /debug/tracing/current_tracer

and you should be seeing the worst-case scheduling latency traces in 
/debug/tracing/trace, and the largest observed latency will be in 
/debug/tracing/tracing_max_latency [in microseconds].

You can reset the max-latency (and thus restart tracing) via:

    echo 0 > /debug/tracing/tracing_max_latency

Latencies up to 100 microseconds are ok. If you see 10 seconds delays 
there (values of 10,000,000 or more) then it's probably a scheduler bug.

Please reproduce the latency under KVM and send us the trace. The trace 
file will be a lot more verbose and a lot more verbose if you also enable 
the function tracer (FUNCTION_TRACER, DYNAMIC_FTRACE and 
FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER).

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/