linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090120140611.GC17004@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:06:11 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Ben Mansell <ben@...s.com>
Cc:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, dada1@...mosbay.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:43:52PM +0000, Ben Mansell wrote:
...
> With an unpatched kernel, the splice performance was worse (due to the  
> one packet per-splice issues). With the small patch to fix that, I was  
> getting around 2 Gbps performance, although oddly enough, I could only  
> get 2 Gbps with read()/write() then as well...
>
> I'll try and do some tests on a machine that hopefully doesn't have the  
> bottlenecks (and one that uses different NICs)

I guess you should especially check if SG and checksums are on, and it
could depend on a chip within those NICs as well.

Jarek P. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/