linux-kernel - disabling interupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49760A60.7040804@celticblues.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:31:12 -0600
From:	linux <linux@...ticblues.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: disabling interupts 

Please advise if this question is OT.  (If so, where can I post it or 
read more about said topic?)

I have an application that grabs frames from a frame grabber.  It is 
dropping frames, sometimes, 30 frames at a time.  I suspect this is 
occuring due to background tasks or something like that interupting the 
app.   In the future I may go to a hard RT linux, but for now, I just 
have time to try to reduce the number and frequency of frame drops. 

I read on some linux websites that one can disable interrupts to 
increase performance and/or reduce latencies. 

My questions are

1.  Is this an acceptable practice?  If not, what are my other options?

2.  How can I do this?  

Would I use:
    void local_irq_save(unsigned long flags);
    void local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags);

3.  What interupts should I consider disabling?

Ed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/