[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901202203.44103.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:03:42 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: Fix suspend-resume of PCI USB controllers
On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Len Brown wrote:
>
> > > Alan, does this look ok for you?
> >
> > There are a few things I don't like about it:
> >
> > In usb_hcd_pci_suspend, the failure path for
> > pci_set_power_state doesn't undo all the changes
> > that have already been made. In fact, the easiest
> > way to do the rest of the recovery probably is to
> > call usb_hcd_pci_resume directly.
> >
> > In the !has_pci_pm path we don't call pci_set_power_state.
> > This means controllers with legacy power management won't
> > get suspended. Maybe pci_set_power_state should be
> > called always, and has_pci_pm be used only for
> > interpreting the return code and printing debug messages.
> >
> > In usb_hcd_pci_resume, the pci_wake_from_d3 call
> > should be moved up right next to the pci_enable_wake
> > call. It makes no sense for them to be separated by
> > pci_enable_device and pci_set_master. After all,
> > even if you can't re-enable the device you probably
> > don't want it to continue being a wakeup source.
> >
> > It's a little annoying that several debug messages
> > in usb_hcd_pci_resume have been removed. Can't we
> > display the power state upon entry, before trying to
> > change it?
> >
> > It stands out that the resume method contains no call
> > to match pci_set_power_state() in the suspend method.
> > There should at least be a comment about it.
> >
> > Some of these problems predate Rafael's patch. Given that it has
> > already helped a number of people, we might want to merge the patch
> > and then make additional changes to address these issues.
>
> Rafael's patch is required for upstream to resume on my T61.
>
> Tested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>
> Perhaps Greg can apply Rafael's patch now to fix upstream ASAP,
> while Alan prepares a 2nd patch to address his observations above?
I'd very much appreciate doing that. My intention was only to fix the urgent
issue at hand.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists