linux-kernel - Re: Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:18:08 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@....de>
Cc:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image

On Tue 2009-01-20 18:34:55, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> * Dave Chinner (david@...morbit.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> > > * Dave Chinner (david@...morbit.com) wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> > > > > * Pavel Machek (pavel@...e.cz) wrote:
> > > > > > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in
> > > > > > production' and should survive it...
> > > > > 
> > > > > I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of 
> > > > > vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs,
> > > > > hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines.
> > > > 
> > > > Any reason you are not testing XFS in that set?
> > > 
> > > So far the responses from xfs folks have been disappointing, if you are
> > > interested in bugreports i can send you some.
> > 
> > Sure I am.  It would be good if you could start testing XFS along
> > with all the other filesystems and report anything you find.
> 
> Ok, i wont report stuff with only xfs-internal backtraces from
> xfs_error_report() or are they interesting to you?
> 
> This occurs during mount, box is dead afterwards
> Image can be found here :
> http://www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/xfs.11.img.bz2
> I see this every ~10 images, which makes further testing hard :)

BTW have you considered trying to run fsck.* on such images? I had lot
of fun with e2fsck/e3fsck/fsck.vfat.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/