[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090121082125.GW30821@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:21:25 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Size of sector_t in userspace [Was: fix 41 'make headers_check' warnings]
On Wed, Jan 21 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Jens.
>
> In an attempt to fix some of the issues in our exported Headers jsr
> encountered some strange stuff in types.h.
>
> types.h is exported to userspace where we do not have access to CONFIG_*
> symbols.
> Despite this we use CONFGI_LBD to decide the size of sector_t like this:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LBD
> typedef u64 sector_t;
> typedef u64 blkcnt_t;
> #else
> typedef unsigned long sector_t;
> typedef unsigned long blkcnt_t;
> #endif
>
> But as CONFIG_LBD is never defined in userspace sector_t is now 32
> bit on 32 bit boxes and 64 bit on 64 bit boxes (in userspace).
>
> Is sector:t (and the companion blkcnt_t) really used by userspace?
> If it is - what size is it expected to have?
I don't think it's used by userspace, at least it cannot be used in
userspace <-> kernelspace interactions, since the size isn't fixed.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists