[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090121104811.GB25531@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:48:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: don't alloc_percpu for single workqueue
* Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> allocating memory for every cpu for single workqueue is waste.
good idea.
One detail:
> @@ -906,6 +907,13 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
> const struct cpumask *cpu_map = wq_cpu_map(wq);
> int cpu;
>
> + if (is_wq_single_threaded(wq)) {
> + cleanup_workqueue_thread(wq->cpu_wq);
> + kfree(wq->cpu_wq);
> + kfree(wq);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> cpu_maps_update_begin();
> spin_lock(&workqueue_lock);
> list_del(&wq->list);
Arent we forgetting to remove the workqueue from the &workqueues list in
the new single-thread case?
Also, see the checkpatch output from kernel/workqueue.c - the warnings
below are correct and should be cleaned up.
Ingo
WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level
#268: FILE: workqueue.c:268:
+ printk("%s: recursion depth exceeded: %d\n",
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#304: FILE: workqueue.c:304:
+^I^I^I^I ^Itask_pid_nr(current));$
ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar"
#555: FILE: workqueue.c:555:
+ struct timer_list* timer)
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#916: FILE: workqueue.c:916:
+ ^Icpu_maps_update_done();$
kernel/workqueue.c has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists