lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:48:11 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: don't alloc_percpu for single workqueue


* Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> allocating memory for every cpu for single workqueue is waste.

good idea.

One detail:

> @@ -906,6 +907,13 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
>  	const struct cpumask *cpu_map = wq_cpu_map(wq);
>  	int cpu;
>  
> +	if (is_wq_single_threaded(wq)) {
> +		cleanup_workqueue_thread(wq->cpu_wq);
> +		kfree(wq->cpu_wq);
> +		kfree(wq);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	cpu_maps_update_begin();
>  	spin_lock(&workqueue_lock);
>  	list_del(&wq->list);

Arent we forgetting to remove the workqueue from the &workqueues list in 
the new single-thread case?

Also, see the checkpatch output from kernel/workqueue.c - the warnings 
below are correct and should be cleaned up.

	Ingo

WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level
#268: FILE: workqueue.c:268:
+		printk("%s: recursion depth exceeded: %d\n",

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#304: FILE: workqueue.c:304:
+^I^I^I^I       ^Itask_pid_nr(current));$

ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar"
#555: FILE: workqueue.c:555:
+				struct timer_list* timer)

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
#916: FILE: workqueue.c:916:
+ ^Icpu_maps_update_done();$

kernel/workqueue.c has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ