[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901211313.17394.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:13:16 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@....de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
jaswinder@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
Subject: Re: Confusion in usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Could we add a new symbol for this?
> We know we are going to use this in several places so a simpler variant
> would be more readable.
>
> Something like:
>
> #ifdef __64BIT
> ...
> #endif
>
> When we define __64BIT we would use the __BITS_PER_LONG == 64 check.
I would prefer using the __BITS_PER_LONG == 64 check directly, because
it gives you a warning when __BITS_PER_LONG is undefined, whereas the
#ifdef check gets easily fooled by include order problems. Note that
this is not a problem in the kernel for CONFIG_* symbols which are
always defined before the first #include.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists