[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090121131739.GB4997@ioremap.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:17:39 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Cgroup based OOM killer controller
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 04:38:21PM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan (knikanth@...e.de) wrote:
> As Alan Cox suggested/wondered in this thread,
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/12/235 , this is a container group based approach
> to override the oom killer selection without losing all the benefits of the
> current oom killer heuristics and oom_adj interface.
>
> It adds a tunable oom.victim to the oom cgroup. The oom killer will kill the
> process using the usual badness value but only within the cgroup with the
> maximum value for oom.victim before killing any process from a cgroup with a
> lesser oom.victim number. Oom killing could be disabled by setting
> oom.victim=0.
Looks good, except that in some conditions (everyone has zero for
example) victim=0 does not disalbe oom-killer because of !chosen
part of the condition.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists