[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49773848.4080409@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:59:20 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
Kevin Shanahan wrote:
>>> --- hermes-old.wumi.org.au ping statistics ---
>>> 900 packets transmitted, 900 received, 0% packet loss, time 899326ms
>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.093/0.157/3.611/0.117 ms
>>>
>>> So, a _huge_ difference. But what does it mean?
>>>
>> It means, a scheduling problem. Can you run the latency tracer (which
>> only works with realtime priority), so we can tell if it is (a) kvm
>> failing to wake up the vcpu properly or (b) the scheduler delaying the
>> vcpu from running.
>>
>
> Sorry, but are you sure that's going to be useful?
>
> If it only works on realtime threads and I'm not seeing the problem when
> running kvm with realtime priority, is this going to tell you what you
> want to know?
>
> Not trying to be difficult, but that just didn't make sense to me.
>
You're right, wasn't thinking properly.
This is a tough one. I'll see if I can think of something. Ingo, any
ideas?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists