[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090121153355.GA19169@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:55 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev@...nvz.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: Don't looking for a task in create_kthread()
#2
On 01/20, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
>
> Ok, I understand you. You want to decrease kthreadd latency. In this case
> your suggestion is right.
Please feel free to send the patch then.
> > OK, please forget. This reminds me kthread.c needs a major rework
> > anyway, hopefully I'll try to do this soon.
>
> I also have intent to make kthread_run/kthread_create more easy used for
> threads that exit himself on error.
> For example, we create some thread THR, which does something but exits on error.
> So in normal case we need to call kthread_stop() to stop thread THR, but on
> error we don't. This is a problem, because we can't simple (without race)
> determine that THR was exited.
This is only one of the problems,
> Simple workaround - do a sleeping loop in thread THR and don't exit until kthread_should_stop.
> But it isn't a good for code reading/writing.
>
> So my suggestion is: Move workaround sleeping logic from THR to low level
> functions:
> wait for a kthread_should_stop in kthread() if THR was exited.
I think it is better to improve kthread_stop() so it can be used even
if kthread has already exited, this is not that hard.
But there are other problems, I'll try to provide mor info later.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists