linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <20090121040530.GA17373@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:05:30 -0600
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bastian@...di.eu.org,
	oleg@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	roland@...hat.com, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics

Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com):
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com] wrote:
> | On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:26:38 -0800
> | Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> | 
> | > 
> | > Container-init must behave like global-init to processes within the
> | > container and hence it must be immune to unhandled fatal signals from
> | > within the container (i.e SIG_DFL signals that terminate the process).
> | > 
> | > But the same container-init must behave like a normal process to 
> | > processes in ancestor namespaces and so if it receives the same fatal
> | > signal from a process in ancestor namespace, the signal must be
> | > processed.
> | > 
> | > Implementing these semantics requires that send_signal() determine pid
> | > namespace of the sender but since signals can originate from workqueues/
> | > interrupt-handlers, determining pid namespace of sender may not always
> | > be possible or safe.
> | > 
> | 
> | Is this feature is for blocking signals from children to name-space
> | creator(owner) ?  And automatically used when namespace/cgroup is created ?
> | IOW, Container-init is Namespace-Cgroup-init ? 
> 
> I am not sure what "Namespace-cgroup-init refers" to.

It sounds like he means the first task in a newly created
ns cgroup.  In which case he would mean any task which has
done an unshare with any of CLONE_NEWNS, CLONE_NEWIPC, etc,
or is the result of clone with the same.

> But, yes, this patchset applies to the first process in a pid namespace
> i.e the child of clone(NEWPID) call.
> 
> | 
> | I'm glad if you add some documentation updates about how-it-works to patch set.
> 
> Yes,  when the patchset is accepted, I am planning to add some notes to
> /sbin/init man page. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sukadev
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives