linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/5] klist.c: bit 0 in pointer can't be used as flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1232515197-3974-5-git-send-email-gregkh@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:19:57 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Jesper Nilsson <Jesper.Nilsson@...s.com>,
	Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@...il.com>,
	Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
	stable <stable@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] klist.c: bit 0 in pointer can't be used as flag

From: Jesper Nilsson <Jesper.Nilsson@...s.com>

The commit a1ed5b0cffe4b16a93a6a3390e8cee0fbef94f86
(klist: don't iterate over deleted entries) introduces use of the
low bit in a pointer to indicate if the knode is dead or not,
assuming that this bit is always free.

This is not true for all architectures, CRIS for example may align data
on byte borders.

The result is a bunch of warnings on bootup, devices not being
added correctly etc, reported by Hinko Kocevar <hinko.kocevar@...rtapot.si>:

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at lib/klist.c:62 ()
Modules linked in:

Stack from c1fe1cf0:
       c01cc7f4 c1fe1d11 c000eb4e c000e4de 00000000 00000000 c1f4f78f c1f50c2d
       c01d008c c1fdd1a0 c1fdd1a0 c1fe1d38 c0192954 c1fe0000 00000000 c1fe1dc0
       00000002 7fffffff c1fe1da8 c0192d50 c1fe1dc0 00000002 7fffffff c1ff9fcc
Call Trace: [<c000eb4e>] [<c000e4de>] [<c0192954>] [<c0192d50>] [<c001d49e>] [<c000b688>] [<c0192a3c>]
       [<c000b63e>] [<c000b63e>] [<c001a542>] [<c00b55b0>] [<c00411c0>] [<c00b559c>] [<c01918e6>] [<c0191988>]
       [<c01919d0>] [<c00cd9c8>] [<c00cdd6a>] [<c0034178>] [<c000409a>] [<c0015576>] [<c0029130>] [<c0029078>]
       [<c0029170>] [<c0012336>] [<c00b4076>] [<c00b4770>] [<c006d6e4>] [<c006d974>] [<c006dca0>] [<c0028d6c>]
       [<c0028e12>] [<c0006424>] <4>---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
Repeat ad nauseam.

Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:11:32AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Perhaps using a pointerhackalign trick on this structure where
> #define pointerhackalign(x) __attribute__ ((aligned (x)))
> and declare
> struct klist_node {
> ...
> }  pointerhackalign(2);
>
> Because  __attribute__ ((aligned (x))) could only increase alignment
> it will safe to do that and serve as documentation purpose :)

That works, but we need to do it not for the struct klist_node,
but for the struct we insert into the void * in klist_node,
which is struct klist.

Reported-by: Hinko Kocevar <hinko.kocevar@...rtapot.si
Cc: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>
Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 include/linux/klist.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/klist.h b/include/linux/klist.h
index d5a27af..e91a4e5 100644
--- a/include/linux/klist.h
+++ b/include/linux/klist.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct klist {
 	struct list_head	k_list;
 	void			(*get)(struct klist_node *);
 	void			(*put)(struct klist_node *);
-};
+} __attribute__ ((aligned (4)));
 
 #define KLIST_INIT(_name, _get, _put)					\
 	{ .k_lock	= __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(_name.k_lock),		\
-- 
1.6.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/