[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090122092942.GA30467@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:29:42 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] trace: do not disable wake up tracer on output of
trace
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> auto-disabling latency tracing while the trace is being output is
> essential. Measurement should never impact the workload that is being
> measured.
On the other hand - the latencies caused by tracing output itself should be
quite low, correct? If not then that needs fixing too. So i've picked up
your change - lets see how useful the result is.
But "if it hurts, disable tracing before reading the tracing result" method
you expressed is really not acceptable.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists