[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090122094505.GF6290@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:45:05 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: remove duplicate CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:30:23AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:46:38AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > >
> > > Impact: remove the old CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR
> > >
> > > tree_rcu introduce CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR again.
> > >
> > > These two are the same exactly except:
> > > the old one "depends on CLASSIC_RCU"
> > > the new one "depends on CLASSIC_RCU || TREE_RCU"
> > >
> > > This patch remove the old one.
> >
> > Good eyes!
> >
> > However, Jiri Kosina has already queued this up for the trivial tree:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/15/218
>
> i've queued it up in tip/core/urgent, as we already touch the RCU Kconfig
> structure there.
Works for me!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists