linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Finish fs/Kconfig split

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090122221123.ef9bd664.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:11:23 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Finish fs/Kconfig split

Hi Alexey,

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:43:16 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Linus, please pull from
> 
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/adobriyan/misc.git Kconfig
> 
> to get finalization of fs/Kconfig split into individual fs/*/Kconfig files.
> FS maintainers liked the idea overall and patches for ext* et al are already in.
> 
> I can sit here and carefully minimize reject pain for everyone or you can do
> the right thing.

There were a few conflicts against the current linux-next, but they were
all in the nfs tree (and the FS-Cache changes in there) apart from one
small conflict in the nfsd tree.  None looked hard to fix up (as you would
expect).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped