linux-kernel - Re: IXP4XX queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b0438a630901220508y479a2ff5o9cfa228bcafe0b2b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:08:43 +0100
From:	Miguel Ángel Álvarez <gotzoncabanes@...il.com>
To:	Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org>
Cc:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IXP4XX queues

Hi

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org> wrote:
> Miguel Ángel Álvarez wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Last December we talked about 64 queues and IXP4XX. Karl has a patch
>> for them, and although I think it could be better to splitt it into
>> two different ones ("plain 64 queue expansion" for which I proposed a
>> modified patch based on Karl's, and "debugging and other things"), I
>> prefer Karl's to none.
>>
>> What do you think of this? Which should be the best way to include it
>> in the main stream kernel?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Miguel Ángel
>>
>>
> The patch needs minor  rework so it  applies cleanly against 2.6.29-rc2
> at the moment i don't have time to do this and test it.
>
I do not have much problem in doing that rework myself. However I need
help in making its way into the kernel, because I have not good
experiences in that.

Miguel Ángel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/