[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090121.171849.220592075.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:18:49 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: yinghai@...nel.org
Cc: mpm@...enic.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc64 build breakage...
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:15:53 -0800 (PST)
>
> This change:
>
> commit d7e51e66899f95dabc89b4d4c6674a6e50fa37fc
> Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Date: Wed Jan 7 15:03:13 2009 -0800
>
> sparseirq: make some func to be used with genirq
>
> breaks the sparc64 build:
...
> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c: In function ‘show_interrupts’:
> arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c:188: error: ‘struct kernel_stat’ has no member named ‘irqs’
> make[1]: *** [arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.o] Error 1
>
> This should fix it:
>
> sparc64: Fix build by using kstat_irqs_cpu().
Actually this isn't enough, next failure:
arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c: In function ‘timer_interrupt’:
arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c:732: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu’
make[1]: *** [arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.o] Error 1
There seems to be a disconnect in linux/kernel_stat.h about
providing the same set of interfaces whether GENERIC_IRQS
is set or not. kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu is one example.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists