[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901212037090.1737@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:43:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/function-graph-tracer: various fixes and
features
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> I thought I would have the time to implement the callbacks in trace_event too but I
> really have to sleep :-(
> That will be for later.
No need to rush. Get to sleep.
> --
>
> This patch brings various bugfixes:
>
> _ Drop the first irrelevant task switch on the very beginning of a trace.
> But actually that only solves the first time one does print the trace file.
> I have to fix the others cases too.
I'm not sure what you mean by the first time here. Can you explain it
a bit better.
> _ Drop the OVERHEAD word from the headers, the DURATION word is sufficient and will not
> overlap other columns.
> _ Make the headers fit well their respective columns whatever the selected options.
>
> Ie, default options:
>
> # tracer: function_graph
> #
> # CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
> # | | | | | | |
>
> 1) 0.646 us | }
> 1) | mem_cgroup_del_lru_list() {
> 1) 0.624 us | lookup_page_cgroup();
> 1) 1.970 us | }
>
> echo funcgraph-proc > trace_options
>
> # tracer: function_graph
> #
> # CPU TASK/PID DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
> # | | | | | | | | |
>
> 0) bash-2937 | 0.895 us | }
> 0) bash-2937 | 0.888 us | __rcu_read_unlock();
> 0) bash-2937 | 0.864 us | conv_uni_to_pc();
> 0) bash-2937 | 1.015 us | __rcu_read_lock();
>
> echo nofuncgraph-cpu > trace_options
> echo nofuncgraph-proc > trace_options
>
> # tracer: function_graph
> #
> # DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
> # | | | | | |
>
> 3.752 us | native_pud_val();
> 0.616 us | native_pud_val();
> 0.624 us | native_pmd_val();
>
>
> About features, one can now disable the duration (this will hide the overhead too
> for convenient reasons and because on doesn't need overhead if it hasn't the duration
>
> echo nofuncgraph-duration > trace_options
>
> # tracer: function_graph
> #
> # FUNCTION CALLS
> # | | | |
>
> cap_vm_enough_memory() {
> __vm_enough_memory() {
> vm_acct_memory();
> }
> }
> }
>
> And at last, an option to print the absolute time:
>
> //Restart from default options
> echo funcgraph-abstime > trace_options
>
> # tracer: function_graph
> #
> # TIME CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
> # | | | | | | | |
>
> 261.339774 | 1) + 42.823 us | }
> 261.339775 | 1) 1.045 us | _spin_lock_irq();
> 261.339777 | 1) 0.940 us | _spin_lock_irqsave();
> 261.339778 | 1) 0.752 us | _spin_unlock_irqrestore();
> 261.339780 | 1) 0.857 us | _spin_unlock_irq();
> 261.339782 | 1) | flush_to_ldisc() {
> 261.339783 | 1) | tty_ldisc_ref() {
> 261.339783 | 1) | tty_ldisc_try() {
> 261.339784 | 1) 1.075 us | _spin_lock_irqsave();
> 261.339786 | 1) 0.842 us | _spin_unlock_irqrestore();
> 261.339788 | 1) 4.211 us | }
> 261.339788 | 1) 5.662 us | }
>
> The format is seconds.usecs
> I guess no one needs the nanosec precision here, the main goal is to find when happened
> the events on a cpu when the trace switches from one cpu to another.
>
> ie:
>
> 274.874760 | 1) 0.676 us | _spin_unlock();
> 274.874762 | 1) 0.609 us | native_load_sp0();
> 274.874763 | 1) 0.602 us | native_load_tls();
> 274.878739 | 0) 0.722 us | }
> 274.878740 | 0) 0.714 us | native_pmd_val();
> 274.878741 | 0) 0.730 us | native_pmd_val();
>
> Here there is a 4000 usecs difference when we switch the cpu.
These examples will most likely be cut from the change log. Updating
ftrace.txt would be nice ;-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists