These two are also remakably similar Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra --- kernel/lockdep.c | 58 ++++++++++++++----------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c @@ -2056,31 +2056,39 @@ static int exclusive_bit(int new_bit) return state | (dir ^ 2); } +typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, + enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name); + static int -mark_lock_irq_used_in(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, +mark_lock_irq_write(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int new_bit) { const char *name = state_name(new_bit); const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit); int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit); + int dir = new_bit & 2; + + check_usage_f usage = dir ? + check_usage_backwards : check_usage_forwards; if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit)) return 0; if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1)) return 0; + /* * just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock * took no hardirq-unsafe lock in the past: */ - if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name)) + if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, name)) return 0; #if STRICT_READ_CHECKS /* * just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock * took no hardirq-unsafe-read lock in the past: */ - if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname)) + if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname)) return 0; #endif if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this))) @@ -2124,40 +2132,6 @@ mark_lock_irq_read(struct task_struct *c return 1; } -static int -mark_lock_irq_enabled(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, - int new_bit) -{ - const char *name = state_name(new_bit); - const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit); - - int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit); - - if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit)) - return 0; - if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1)) - return 0; - /* - * just marked it hardirq-unsafe, check that no hardirq-safe - * lock in the system ever took it in the past: - */ - if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name)) - return 0; -#if STRICT_READ_CHECKS - /* - * just marked it hardirq-unsafe, check that no - * hardirq-safe-read lock in the system ever took - * it in the past: - */ - if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname)) - return 0; -#endif - if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this))) - return 2; - - return 1; -} - static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) { @@ -2167,7 +2141,10 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ: case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ: case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS: - return mark_lock_irq_used_in(curr, this, new_bit); + case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ: + case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ: + case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS: + return mark_lock_irq_write(curr, this, new_bit); case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ: case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ: @@ -2177,11 +2154,6 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ: return mark_lock_irq_read(curr, this, new_bit); - case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ: - case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ: - case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS: - return mark_lock_irq_enabled(curr, this, new_bit); - default: WARN_ON(1); break; -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/