Remove the manual state iteration thingy. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra --- kernel/lockdep.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c @@ -1268,68 +1268,81 @@ check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, st bit_backwards, bit_forwards, irqclass); } -static int -check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, - struct held_lock *next) +static const char *state_names[] = { +#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ + STR(__STATE), +#include "lockdep_states.h" +#undef LOCKDEP_STATE +}; + +static const char *state_rnames[] = { +#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ + STR(__STATE)"-READ", +#include "lockdep_states.h" +#undef LOCKDEP_STATE +}; + +static inline const char *state_name(enum lock_usage_bit bit) +{ + return (bit & 1) ? state_rnames[bit >> 2] : state_names[bit >> 2]; +} + +static int exclusive_bit(int new_bit) { /* - * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe - * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search - * the backwards-subgraph starting at , and the - * forwards-subgraph starting at : + * USED_IN + * USED_IN_READ + * ENABLED + * ENABLED_READ + * + * bit 0 - write/read + * bit 1 - used_in/enabled + * bit 2+ state */ - if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ, - LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ, "hard")) - return 0; + int state = new_bit & ~3; + int dir = new_bit & 2; + + return state | (dir ^ 2); +} + +static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, + struct held_lock *next, enum lock_usage_bit bit) +{ /* - * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe-read + * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search * the backwards-subgraph starting at , and the * forwards-subgraph starting at : */ - if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ, - LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ, "hard-read")) + if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, bit, + exclusive_bit(bit), state_name(bit))) return 0; - /* - * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a softirq-safe - * lock with a softirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search - * the backwards-subgraph starting at , and the - * forwards-subgraph starting at : - */ - if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ, - LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ, "soft")) - return 0; - /* - * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a softirq-safe-read - * lock with a softirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search - * the backwards-subgraph starting at , and the - * forwards-subgraph starting at : - */ - if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ, - LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ, "soft")) - return 0; + bit++; /* _READ */ /* - * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a reclaim-fs-safe - * lock with a reclaim-fs-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search + * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe-read + * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search * the backwards-subgraph starting at , and the * forwards-subgraph starting at : */ - if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS, - LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs")) + if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, bit, + exclusive_bit(bit), state_name(bit))) return 0; - /* - * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a reclaim-fs-safe-read - * lock with a reclaim-fs-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search - * the backwards-subgraph starting at , and the - * forwards-subgraph starting at : - */ - if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ, - LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs-read")) + return 1; +} + +static int +check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, + struct held_lock *next) +{ +#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ + if (!check_irq_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE)) \ return 0; +#include "lockdep_states.h" +#undef LOCKDEP_STATE return 1; } @@ -1984,30 +1997,6 @@ static int RECLAIM_FS_verbose(struct loc #define STRICT_READ_CHECKS 1 -static const char *state_names[] = { -#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ - STR(__STATE), -#include "lockdep_states.h" -#undef LOCKDEP_STATE -}; - -static inline const char *state_name(enum lock_usage_bit bit) -{ - return state_names[bit >> 2]; -} - -static const char *state_rnames[] = { -#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ - STR(__STATE)"-READ", -#include "lockdep_states.h" -#undef LOCKDEP_STATE -}; - -static inline const char *state_rname(enum lock_usage_bit bit) -{ - return state_rnames[bit >> 2]; -} - static int (*state_verbose_f[])(struct lock_class *class) = { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ __STATE##_verbose, @@ -2021,34 +2010,12 @@ static inline int state_verbose(enum loc return state_verbose_f[bit >> 2](class); } -static int exclusive_bit(int new_bit) -{ - /* - * USED_IN - * USED_IN_READ - * ENABLED - * ENABLED_READ - * - * bit 0 - write/read - * bit 1 - used_in/enabled - * bit 2+ state - */ - - int state = new_bit & ~3; - int dir = new_bit & 2; - - return state | (dir ^ 2); -} - typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name); static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int new_bit) { - const char *name = state_name(new_bit); - const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit); - int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit); int read = new_bit & 1; int dir = new_bit & 2; @@ -2063,11 +2030,12 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, return 0; if ((!read || (!dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS)) && - !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, name)) + !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit))) return 0; if ((!read && STRICT_READ_CHECKS) && - !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname)) + !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, + state_name(new_bit + 1))) return 0; if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this))) -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/